|
pA2 online
© Copyright 2004 The British Pharmacological Society
|
041P
University of Newcastle
Winter Meeting December 2004
|
Amphetamine-induced behavioural sensitisation is enhanced by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A and is associated with differential changes in forebrain endocannabinoid content
G. Thiemann1, M. van der Stelt2, K. Ignatian1, V. di Marzo2, A. Molleman3, R.U. Hasenöhrl1. 1School of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UK. 2Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pozzuoli, Italy. 3School of Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UK. |
Print abstract
Search PubMed for:
Thiemann G
Van der Stelt M
Ignatian K
Di Marzo V
Molleman A
Hasenöhrl RU
|
Cannabinoid receptors and their endogenous ligands have been implicated in the control of psychostimulant induced reward-related behaviours. Their involvement in behavioural sensitisation produced by psychostimulants has still to be determined. This study investigated the effect of a pharmacological blockade of the CB1 receptor on amphetamine-induced sensitisation in CD1 mice. Furthermore, tissue levels of the two most prominent endocannabinoids 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA) were measured in several forebrain structures to gauge a possible relationship between behavioural sensitisation and endocannabinoid transmission. Mice were pre-treated with the CB1 antagonist SR141716A (3 mg/kg) 30 min before being injected with amphetamine (4 mg/kg) for 7 consecutive days. On the challenge test day, performed after 3 drug abstinence days, the animals were injected with amphetamine (1 mg/kg) only. On each treatment day, locomotor activity was recorded for 60 min following injection. After termination of the behavioural tests, concentrations of AEA and 2-AG were measured in the hippocampus, striatum and in the nucleus accumbens using isotope dilution liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. ANOVA followed by Tukey test revealed that amphetamine-pretreated mice showed an increased locomotor response to the challenge injection (mean±SEM distance moved: 412.7±57.3 m) compared with vehicle-pretreated animals (188.8±39.3 m) and that the effect of the amphetamine pre-treatment was significantly potentiated by SR141716A (623.8±92.2 m; p< 0.05); the CB1 antagonist did not significantly affect locomotion when administered alone (260.0±40.2 m; p> 0.05). Student’s t-tests (2-tailed) showed that the sensitized mice and the animals, which had received a single amphetamine injection on the challenge test day, both had increased AEA levels in the striatum (acute: +204.1±36.5%, p< 0.001; sensitised: +178.4±40.2%, p= 0.001) and decreased AEA concentrations in the nucleus accumbens (acute: -35.9±5.4%, p< 0.001; sensitised: -29.7±5.9%, p= 0.003). In addition, the acute amphetamine challenge enhanced AEA concentrations in hippocampus (+33.7±11.5%, p= 0.031). 2-AG levels were increased in the striatum (+51.8±13.8%, p= 0.038) and decreased in the nucleus accumbens (-30.3±9.6%, p= 0.036) of the sensitised animals only.
The present findings suggest that the acute locomotor activating effects of amphetamine may be related in part to changes in striatal, accumbal and hippocampal AEA levels, whereas amphetamine sensitization may be linked mostly to alterations in striatal 2-AG concentrations. Since enhanced cannabinoid levels in the striatum are considered to feedback negatively on dopaminergic signalling, the former effects on AEA and 2-AG contents are in agreement with the observed stimulating effects of SR141716A on amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. |