Print version

pdf Click to download

Search Pub Med

Back
096P Institute of Education, London
Winter Meeting December 2005

 

Antagonist affinity measurements at the histamine H2 receptor are independent of the agonist used

Jillian G Baker & Stephen J Hill. Institute of Cell Signalling, University of Nottingham, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH.

Antagonist affinity measurements at a given receptor are generally considered to be constant for a given receptor-ligand interaction. However studies of the Gs-coupled human β2-adrenoceptor have shown that antagonist affinity measurements can vary up to 10-fold in CRE-gene transcription assays depending on the efficacy of the competing agonist (Baker et al., 2003). Antagonist affinity measurements at the human β1 and β3-adrenoceptors also vary depending on the competing agonist and this has been attributed to the presence of at least two active sites of the receptor (Granneman 2001; Baker 2005). The aim of this study was to determine whether the antagonist affinity measurements at another Gs-coupled receptor, the human histamine H2-receptor, change with the nature of the competing agonist used.

CHO cells stably expressing the human histamine H2-receptor and a cAMP response element (CRE)-secreted placental alkaline phosphatase (SPAP) reporter gene were used. CRE-SPAP production was measured as previously described (Baker et al., 2003).

The affinities of seven H2-antagonists were determined in functional CRE-SPAP assays from parallel shifts of agonist concentration response curves in a similar manner to that described in Baker et al., 2003. Histamine, Nα-methylhistamine (NαMH) and amthamine were found to be full agonists in this system. Dimaprit, however, has been reported to be a lower efficacy H2-receptor agonist (Hill, 1990). In the present study, maximum responses to dimaprit decreased with increasing concentrations of the longer acting antagonist ICI 162846 confirming this lower efficacy.

Unlike the β2-adrenoceptor, antagonist affinities measurements at the H2 receptor appear the same regardless of the efficacy of the competing ligands (Table 1).

 

 

histamine

n

NαMH

n

amthamine

n

dimaprit

n

Cimetidine

-6.10±0.08

9

-6.11±0.05

9

-6.11±0.10

8

-6.02±0.04

8

Ranitidine

-6.81±0.03

10

-6.78±0.05

9

-6.73±0.04

9

-6.84±0.05

9

Nizatidine

-6.88±0.05

10

-6.75±0.04

9

-6.86±0.04

9

-6.73±0.05

8

Tiotidine

-7.85±0.10

11

-7.70±0.08

9

-7.72±0.07

9

-7.74±0.07

7

Famotidine

-7.89±0.04

11

-7.87±0.03

9

-7.82±0.06

9

-7.92±0.10

7

Zolatidine

-7.38±0.10

10

-7.36±0.07

8

-7.24±0.04

9

-7.34±0.10

7

ICI 162846

-8.75±0.06

13

-8.67±0.05

9

-8.64±0.04

9

-8.70±0.07

5

 

 

Table1. Log K D values of several antagonists at the human H2 receptor (mean ± s.e.m.)

 

Baker J.G. et al., (2003). Mol. Pharmacol. 64, 679-688.
Baker J.G (2005) Mol. Pharmacol. 68, 1645-1655.
Granneman J.G. (2001) Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 280, E199-202.
Hill S.J. (1990) Pharmacol Rev 42,45-85.