Print version

pdf Click to download

Search Pub Med

Back
064P University of Cambridge
The Twelfth International Conference on Endothelin 2011

 

 

Scratching behaviour elicited by endothelin-1 in the mouse cheek model

Lenyta Oliveira, Daniela Balz, Giles Rae. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Dept. Pharmacology, 88049-900, Brazil.

 

Itch, a frequent and sometimes severe symptom in skin and other diseases, is a sensation mediated by distinct neural circuits and multiple mediators. Intradermal (i.d.) injection of endothelin-1 (ET-1), into the scruff of the neck, causes scratching behavior suggestive of overt pruritus. This study assesses the role of ETA and ETB receptors in ET-1-induced pruritus in the “mouse cheek model” proposed by Shimada and LaMotte (2008), which discriminates pruritus from nociception, as well as some mechanisms which modulate the response to ET-1.

Male 2-month old CD1 mice had both cheeks shaved. Two days later, each mouse received an i.d. injection of ET-1 (3, 10, 30 pmol) or vehicle (20 µl) into the left cheek. The number hind paw scratching bouts, directed to the injected cheek, were filmed and counted over 40 min. In some experiments, BQ-123 and/or BQ-788 (ETA or ETB receptor antagonists, respectively; 10 nmol, i.d.) were injected 5 min prior to ipsilateral ET-1 (30 pmol) injection. In others, ET-1 was co-injected together with antagonists for µ (CTOP, 20 nmol), κ (Nor-BNI, 68 nmol) or δ opioid receptors (Naltrindole, 80 nmol), or agonists for µ (DAMGO, 100 nmol) or κ receptors (U50488-H, 100 nmol). Alternatively, loratadine (histamine H1 receptor antagonist; 10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) was injected 1 h before ET-1. In another experiment, the cheek was removed 15 min after i.d. ET-1 or vehicle injection, and the number of degranulated mast cells was quantified by histology in 7 µm sections stained with Toluidine Blue. The study was approved by UFSC’s Ethics Committee on Animal Use.

Injection of ET-1 promoted dose-dependent bouts of scratching (30 pmol: 49 ± 3 bouts). Treatment with BQ-123 prior to ET-1(30 pmol) reduced scratching (9 ± 3 bouts), whereas BQ-788 increased them (82 ± 10 bouts). Co-injection of both antagonists resulted in significantly less scratching bouts than that recorded following BQ-788 + ET-1(13 ± 2 bouts). Co-injection of CTOP or Nor-BNI, together with ET-1, increased scratching responses by 54% and 24 %, respectively. Naltrindole did not modify the scratching response to ET-1. The µ-selective opioid agonist DAMGO reduced the scratching bouts by 50 %, but the selective κ agonist U-50488H was not effective. Loratadine reduced the scratching bouts by 22%. Cheek skin sections obtained 15 min after ET-1 showed more degranulated mast cells than vehicle-treated controls.

These results confirm in the mouse cheek model that ET-1 induces ETA receptor-mediated pruritus and that ETB receptors limit this response. The pruritogenic response to ET-1 seems to be modulated by endogenous opioids activating local µ opioid receptors in this model, but the role of κ receptors in controlling scratching remains to be better characterized. This pruritogenic response seems to be modulated only partially by histamine and coincides in time with local mast cell degranulation.

Financial Support: CNPq, CAPES, FAPESC and PRONEX (Brazil).