138P Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre London
Pharmacology 2014

 

 

Development Of A Limited Sampling Strategy For Mycophenolate Mofetil In Adult Patients With Lupus Nephritis

Rohit Kodagali, Binu Susan Mathew, Denise H Fleming, Gopal Basu, V Tamilarasi, Ratna Prabha Gupta, Kalpana Ernest. Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Background: - Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), the immunosuppressive agent, is commonly used to treat renal transplant patients and patients with other autoimmune diseases such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Due to the high inter-dose, inter-patient variability in drug exposure, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has proved extremely beneficial in individualizing the MMF therapy.(1,2)

Aim: To develop a robust limited sampling strategy (LSS) to measure MPA AUC0-12 hr (Area under the concentration-time curve) in patients with lupus nephritis.

Methods: MPA plasma specimens from 30 patients were prospectively collected at time points 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 hours after patients had taken the Mycept brand (Panacea Biotec, New Delhi) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for lupus nephritis. The measurement of MPA is based on a previous publication using HPLC with UV detection.(3) Limited sampling strategies with acceptable correlation coefficients (R2), bias and precision were developed by stepwise multiple regression analysis using MPA concentrations at time points 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4 and 6 hours post dose. The predictive performance of the LSS was validated using bootstrap validation.

Results: The observed MPA AUC0-12 hr ranged from 19.52 to 67.67 mg.h/L with a mean of 45.12 mg.h/L. The mean dose per Kg body weight of MMF prescribed was 26.47 mg/kg. The serum creatinine values in these patients ranged from 0.46 to 3.15 mg/dl. The Spearman correlation between the MPA AUC0-12 hr and the pre-dose concentration in this study was 0.63. Three LSS models were chosen with a multiple R2>0.87 which included 3 different combinations of concentrations at time points 0, 1, 2, 4 and 6. The best model included concentrations at time points 0, 1, 2 and 4 (multiple R2=0.926). The final model validated post bootstrap is as follows:

MPA AUC0-12Hr = 12.3376 + (2.9013×C0) + (0.8305×C1) + (0.7945×C2) + (4.5156×C4).

Here, C0, C1, C2, C4 refer to the MPA concentrations at that particular time point. No statistical or clinical difference was found between the two methods (observed and LSS predicted) of MPA measurement (paired t-test t-value=0.705; Intraclass correlation=0.981; 95 % confidence interval (0.960-0.991)). Calculated bias and imprecision were -0.13 and 7.09 % respectively.

Conclusion: For patients on Mycept for lupus nephritis, this 4 point LSS is an accurate measure of the full 12-hour AUC with favourable bias and imprecision.

References:

(1) Neumann I et al. J Am Soc Nephrol JASN; 14(3):721–7.

(2) Rahman ANA et al, Clin Pharmacokinet; 52(5):303–31.

(3) Fleming DH et al, J Postgrad Med; 52(4):248–52.