151P London, UK
Pharmacology 2016

 

 

Neither phentolamine nor prazosin behave as classical competitive antagonists against noradrenaline-induced contractions in the porcine isolated splenic artery

A. Abdulrahman1, H. Denfria1, R. Mahajan2, S. Chan1, V. Wilson1. 1Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UNITED KINGDOM, 2Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UNITED KINGDOM.

Introduction: Activation of post-junctional α1- and α2-adrenoceptors is known to cause constriction of blood vessels. The porcine isolated splenic artery (PSA) possesses both alpha-adrenoceptor subtypes (Wright et al., 1995), and α2-adrenoceptor-mediated contractions can be revealed by selective agonists and pharmacological manipulation (Roberts et al., 1999), but studies with subtype-selective antagonists and noradrenaline, only revealed α1-adrenoceptors (Wright et al., 1995). We have compared phentolamine, a non-selective α-adrenoceptor antagonist, and prazosin, a selective α1-adrenoceptor antagonist, against responses of PSA to noradrenaline and A61603, a potent, selective α1-adrenoceptor agonist (Mills et al., 2008).

Methods: Pig spleens were obtained from a local abattoir. Isometric tension recordings were undertaken in vitro with 5mm ring segments of the PSA, that were first exposed to 60mM KCl. Cumulatively increasing concentrations of noradrenaline and A61603 were used to generate response curves (CRC) in the presence of phentolamine (10nM-10µM in half log unit increments) and prazosin (1nM-1µM in half log unit increments) and the pA2 and slope of Schild plot determined. Cocaine (10µM), corticosterone (30µM) and propranolol (1µM) were included in the bathing solution when noradrenaline was used. All values were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) in tissues from different animals (n). A Student’s paired t-test was used to assess the statistical significance of deviation from unity of the slope of the Schild plot.

Results: Both agonists produced concentration-dependent contractions, with A61603 (pD2 8.07±0.1, n=6) 100-fold more potent than noradrenaline (pD2 5.90±0.05, n=7). Phentolamine and prazosin caused concentration-dependent, parallel, rightward shifts of the CRC against both agonists that, with the exception of the highest antagonist concentration, did not change the maximum response. The estimated pA2 values for the antagonists were independent of the agonist, but the slopes of the Schild plot against noradrenaline were significantly different from unity (Table 1).

Table 1 Mean pA2 (± sem) and Slope of Schild Plot for Prazosin and Phentolamine.(* -Denotes that the slope of Schild plot is significantly different from unity (p<0.05)
Drug Antagonist pA2 Slope of the Schild Plot n
Noradrenaline Phentolamine 8.1 ± 0.13 0.67 ± 0.05* 6
Prazosin 9.50 ± 0.25 0.79 ± 0.06* 8
A61603 Phentolamine 8.5 ± 0.10 0.91 ± 0.03 6
Prazosin 9.09 ± 0.23 1.02 ± 0.06 5

 

Conclusion: Based on the estimated pA2 values prazosin was 3-30-fold more potent than phentolamine against A61603 and noradrenaline, respectively, consistent with the presence of only α1-adrenoceptors. However, the slope of the Schild plot for both antagonists against the endogenous ligand was significantly different from unity. Presently, we have no explanation for the different results with the two agonists, but a role for post-junctional α2-adrenoceptors seems unlikely.

References:

Mills K et al., (2008) Br. J. Pharmacol. 155, 110-117

Roberts RE et al., (1999). Br. J. Pharmacol 128: 1705-1712

Wright IK et al (1995). Br. J. Pharmacol 114 157-165