Print version

pdf Click to download

Search Pub Med

Back
007P London, UK
8th European Workshop on Cannabinoid Research

 

 

Coupling of the human recombinant CB2 cannabinoid receptor to extracellular signal-regulated kinase and calcium elevation in Chinese hamster ovary cells

W. Hourani, R. Roberts, S. P. Alexander. Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Discovery, University Of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Background: CB1 cannabinoid receptors are characterised as coupling via the Gi/o family of G proteins to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity and the activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1. CB1 receptors also inhibit voltage-gated calcium channels, activate potassium channels and stimulate calcium mobilisation1. CB2 cannabinoid receptors are described to inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate ERK, but not to regulate ion channel function1. In this study, we have investigated the coupling of human recombinant CB2 cannabinoid receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Methods: Human recombinant CB2 cannabinoid receptors were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. ERK activation was assessed using in cell immunocytochemistry quantified with a Li-Cor Odyssey, while intracellular calcium levels were assessed using fluo-4 with a FlexStation with ATP as a positive control.

Results: A range of cannabinoid agonists both endogenous (anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol), natural (THC, β-caryophyllene and caryophyllene N-oxide) and synthetic (CP55940, WIN55,212-2, fenofibrate,HU210, JWH133, and JWH015)were tested. The following agents evoked maximal responses similar to the positive control fetal bovine serum (78-90 %) with the rank order: WIN55212-2 (pEC50 7.7 ± 0.1)> HU210 (7.4 ± 0.2)>fenofibrate (7.2 ± 0.1), JWH015 (7.2 ± 0.1)>2-AG (6.8 ± 0.1)>JWH133 (6.5 ± 0.1). AEA evoked a reduced maximal response (51%, 5.7 ± 0.2), while β-caryophyllene and caryophyllene N-oxide were inactive. 1 μM AM630, a CB2-selective antagonist, or pretreatment with 100 ng/mL pertussis toxin blocked responses to all these agonists.Calcium ion levels were stimulated by cannabinoid agonists, albeit in a slower manner than ATP. These responses were quantified as area under the curve: WIN55212-2 (21 ± 5 % ATP response, 7.3 ± 0.1), HU210 (24 ± 3, 6.8 ± 0.3), CP55940 (37 ± 5, 6.7 ± 0.3), JWH015 (24 ± 3, 6.4 ± 0.1), fenofibrate (26 ± 3, 6.3 ± 0.2), 2-AG (34 ± 6, 6.2 ± 0.2), JWH133 (29 ± 7, 6.0 ± 0.1) , AEA (11 ± 1, 5.7 ± 0.3). Responses to THC failed to reach statistical significance, while those to β-caryophyllene and caryophyllene N-oxide were not distinguishable from background. Calcium responses to cannabinoid ligands were blocked by pretreatment with 1 μM AM630 or 100 ng/mL pertussis toxin. Cannabinoid ligand-evoked calcium responses were unaltered in the presence of 10 μM U0126, a selective inhibitor of ERK activation.

Conclusions: This is the first study to determine coupling of the CB2 cannabinoid receptor to calcium elevation in recombinant expression.

References :

1. Pertwee et al.(2010). Pharmacol Rev PMID:21079038