058P London, UK
Pharmacology 2017

 

 

Constitutive P2Y2 receptor activity suppresses lipolysis in human adipocytes

S. Ali1, J. Turner2, S. Fountain11Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom, 2Diabetes and Endocrinology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom.

Introduction: Obesity is a global epidemic that represents a significant health and economical issue. Adipocytes in obese individuals display decreased lipolytic (fat-breakdown) activity1. P1 purinergic receptors have an established role in suppressing lipolysis2,3, but little is known about P2 purinoceptors in adipocytes. This study aims to characterise the functional P2 receptors present in human adipocytes and identify their role in lipolysis.

Methods: Adipose-derived mesenchymal cells were isolated from healthy human subcutaneous adipose tissue and differentiated to adipocytes in vitro. Cells were loaded with Fura-2 and incubated with selective P2 receptor antagonists to evaluate effects on basal calcium (Ca2+) and nucleotide-evoked Ca2+ responses using a Flexstation-III. Lipolysis was measured by quantification of glycerol liberation in conditioned supernatants. cAMP concentrations were measured by competitive ELISA. Lentiviral transduction of adipocytes was used for shRNA-mediated knockdown P2Yreceptor.

Results: A robust response to ATP, ADP and UTP was observed (N=6 donors). Antagonists, MRS2500 (P2Y1) and PSB0739 (P2Y12), inhibited the ADP-evoked Ca2+ responses by 45.1±5% (IC50 77.1±38nM) and 39.7±5% (IC5064.0±7nM) (N=6 donors) respectively. These antagonists also blocked the ATP-evoked responses (N=6 donors). Although AR-C118925XX (P2Y2 antagonist) completely inhibited the UTP-evoked Ca2+ responses, IC50 318±399nM (N=6 donors), it only reduced the magnitude of response to ATP by 20.4±3%, IC50 683±116nM (N=6 donors). P2Y1 and P2Y12 antagonists and exogenous nucleotide application had no effect on lipolysis, but inhibition of P2Y2, using AR-C118925XX and P2Y2 shRNA, caused an increase in basal glycerol production by 32.2±7.8% and 31.6±8.6% respectively (N=3 donors). Inhibiting P2Y2 decreased intracellular Ca2+ (11.3±3.6%, N=6 donors) and elevated cAMP (23.3±5.8%, N=4 donors) in adipocytes. Decreased Ca2+ can activate adenylate cyclase, thus increasing cAMP which can subsequently activate the protein kinase A-hormone sensitive lipase lipolytic pathway. P2Y2 knockdown also caused a phenotypic difference in the lipid droplet size in adipocytes, which we hypothesise is due to increased lipolytic activity.

Conclusion: P2Y1, P2Y2 and P2Y12 are involved in the nucleotide-evoked Ca2+ responses in adipocytes. P2Y2 appears to be tonically active and plays a role in constitutively suppressing basal lipolysis by maintaining intracellular Ca2+ to inhibit cAMP production and subsequent downstream lipolysis induction. These findings suggest that P2Y2 may be a novel drug target for controlling lipolysis in human adipocytes.

Reference:

1. Arner et al. (2011). Nature 478: 110-113.

2. Sollevi et al. (1981). Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 316: 112-119.

3. Osisalo, JJ (1981). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 52: 359-363.