Print version
Search Pub Med
- S. Sahan-Firat1
- Z. Kocak1
- M. Temiz-Resitoglu1
- D. S. Guden1
- O. Vezir2
- N. Sucu3
- S. BalcÕ4
- L. Tamer-Gumus4
- B. Tunctan1
- K. U. Malik5. 1Department of Pharmacology
- Mersin University
- Faculty of Pharmacy
- Mersin
- Turkey
- 2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
- Mersin State Hospital
- Mersin
- Turkey
- 3Department of Cardiovascular Surgery
- Mersin University
- Faculty of Medicine
- Mersin
- Turkey
- 4Department of Biochemistry
- Mersin University Faculty of Medicine
- Mersin
- Turkey
- 5Department of Pharmacology
- University of Tennessee College of Medicine
- Memphis
- TN
- United States
151P London, UK Pharmacology 2017 |
Role of mTOR/IκB-α/NF-κB pathway activation in ischemia/reperfusion-induced inflammatory response in rats
Introduction: Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R)-induced injury initiates complex inflammatory cascade by triggering a systemic inflammatory response that results in both target and distant organ injuries (1,2). Recent data indicate mTOR inhibitors significantly influence immune cells after I/R injury (3), but the underlying mechanism in hindlimb I/R remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate whether systemic inflammation following I/R is mediated by mTOR/IκB-α/NF-κB pathway activation in a rat model of hindlimb I/R.
Method: Wistar male rats were randomly divided into vehicle (n=8), I/R (n=8), rapamycin (n=8), and, I/R+rapamycin (n=8) groups. Experiments were performed in according to the NIH Guide and approved by Ethics Committee of Mersin University School of Medicine. Hindlimb tourniquet model was used to induce I/R-injury (4). After 4 h of ischemia, tourniquets were removed and the hindlimb was reperfused for 4 h. Vehicle and I/R groups received saline (4 ml/kg; i.p.), whereas rapamycin and I/R+rapamycin groups received rapamycin (1 mg/kg; i.p. dissolved in a mixture of ethanol:saline) 1 h before reperfusion. The solvent of rapamycin did not apply in any of groups because of the amount of ethanol is negligible. Rats were then anesthetized with ketamine (90 mg/kg, i.m.) and xylazine (10 mg/kg, i.m.) and gastrocnemius muscle, kidney, and blood were collected for the measurement of rpS6, IκB-α, NF-κB p65, iNOS, and COX-2 expression and/or activity by immunoblotting (5), TNF-α by ELISA kit, nitrite levels by Griess method (6), and MPO activity as described (7). Data were expressed as means±SEM and analysis were performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn\'s test and Student’s t or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate.
Results: Rapamycin prevented I/R-induced increase in rpS6, IκB-α, NF-κB p65, iNOS, and COX-2 expression and/or activity, nitrite and TNF-α levels as well as MPO activity (Table 1).
Table 1 Effect of rapamycin on I/R-induced changes related to inflammation
Gastocnemius Muscle | Vehicle | I/R | Rapamycin | I/R+ Rapamycin |
p-rpS6/rpS6 ratio | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.52 ± 0.22* (4) | 0.98 ± 0.04 (4) | 0.93 ± 0.07# (4) |
p-IκB-α/IκB-α ratio | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.91 ± 0.20* (4) | 1.16 ± 0.07 (4) | 1.23 ± 0.14# (4) |
p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 ratio | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.53 ± 0.15* (4) | 0.92 ± 0.06 (4) | 0.83 ± 0.10# (4) |
iNOS expression | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.79 ± 0.27* (4) | 1.06 ± 0.06 (4) | 0.88 ± 0.14# (4) |
COX-2 expression | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.75 ± 0.23* (4) | 1.01 ± 0.09 (4) | 1.09 ± 0.07# (4) |
TNF-α levels | 383.50 ± 42.45 (8) | 521.38 ± 20.87* (8) | 362.13 ± 43.99 (8) | 365.50 ± 49# (8) |
Nitrite levels | 9.93 ± 0.65 (8) | 19.39 ± 2.71* (8) | 11.75 ± 1.05 (8) | 11.63 ± 0.92# (8) |
MPO activity | 327.94 ± 46.38 (8) | 523.94 ± 33.42* (8) | 257.85 ± 20.31 (8) | 310.13 ± 55.15# (8) |
Kidney | ||||
p-rpS6/rpS6 ratio | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.72 ± 0.18* (4) | 1.05 ± 0.08 (4) | 1.07 ± 0.15# (4) |
p-IκB-α/IκB-α ratio | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.96 ± 0.17* (4) | 1.02 ± 0.05 (4) | 0.92 ± 0.06# (4) |
p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 ratio | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.57 ± 0.20* (4) | 0.83 ± 0.10 (4) | 0.90 ± 0.06# (4) |
iNOS expression | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.69 ± 0.12* (4) | 1.06 ± 0.15 (4) | 1.10 ± 0.11# (4) |
COX-2 expression | 1.00 ± 0.00 (4) | 1.37 ± 0.11* (4) | 1.01 ± 0.05 (4) | 1.00 ± 0.06# (4) |
TNF-α levels | 2122.75± 225,21 (8) | 2802.75± 174.8* (8) | 2567.00 ± 211.29 (8) | 2035.00 ± 72,81# (8) |
Nitrite levels | 10.95 ± 0.75 (8) | 18.44 ± 2.65* (8) | 11.24 ± 1.17 (8) | 11.33 ± 0.60# (8) |
MPO activity | 171.99 ± 27.44 (8) | 286.57 ± 33.89* (8) | 202.80 ± 22.65 (8) | 182.80 ± 25.63# (8) |
Serum | ||||
Nitrite levels | 68.51 ± 3.49 (8) | 134.75 ± 18.29* (8) | 80.77 ± 4.04 (8) | 80.09 ± 4.48# (8) |
*( P < 0.05) vs vehicle group, # (P < 0.05) vs I/R group analysed by ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons, Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunns test for multiple comparisons and Student’s t or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate.
Conclusion: Rapamycin protects against I/R-induced systemic inflammation with the target and distant organ injuries via inhibition of mTOR/IκB-α/NF-κB p65 pathway.
References:
1. Gaines GC et al. (1999). J Vasc Surg 29:370-376.
2. Zhao Y et al. (2014). Inflammation 37: 1865-1875.
3. Werner I et al. (2016). J Heart Lung Transplant 35: 188-189.
4. Sari AN et al. (2014). Eur J Pharmacol 723: 234-245.
5. Temiz-Resitoglu M et al. (2017). Eur J Pharmacol 802: 7-19.
6. Green LC et al. (1982). Anal Biochem 126: 131-138.
7. Chance B and Maehley AC (1955). In: Colowich S, Kaplan N (ed). Methods in Enzymology. New York Academic Press: New York, pp 764-775.