029P Nottingham, UK 7th Focused Meeting on Cell Signalling |
Agonist activity of clozapine at muscarinic DREADD receptors
Introduction: Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs) are a chemogenetic tool widely used to dissect signalling in vitro and in vivo1, of which muscarinic DREADDs - hM1Dq, hM3Dq, hM4Di - are most widely used2. Transmembrane mutations render these receptors largely unresponsive to endogenous acetylcholine, but sensitive to the otherwise inert clozapine-N-oxide (CNO). Recent reports suggest back-metabolised clozapine, rather than CNO, is the muscarinic DREADD activator in vivo1. We therefore investigated clozapine agonism at hM1Dq and hM4Di in vitro, and whether back-metabolised clozapine could be detected in CNO-injected mice.
Methods: [3H]-NMS Displacement: Confluent monolayers of FLP-in CHO cells expressing hM1WT, hM4WT, hM1Dq, or hM4Di were incubated in Kreb’s buffer with [3H]-NMS at Kd concentration and increasing ligand concentrations for 2 hr at 37°C. Cells were washed then lysed. Liquid scintillation counting determined bound radioactivity. Functional assays: Assays were carried out according to IP-One-Gq and phosphoERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) Kits (CisBio, France). For IP1, washed and detached cells were resuspended in Stimulation Buffer and stimulated for 1 hr at 37°C. For Thr202/Tyr204 phosphorylation, serum-starved cells were stimulated for 5 min at 37°C then lysed. Resulting IP1 accumulation or Thr202/Tyr204 phosphorylation were determined with cryptate/D2 antibodies and HTRF. Pharmacokinetics: C57bl/6J mice were injected with varying CNO concentrations. After 30 min mice were exsanguinated and brains removed to assess plasma and brain drug exposure (in accordance with ASPA 2012). Data Analysis: All data analysis used GraphPad Prism 7.
Results: Clozapine and CNO displaced [3H]-NMS in hM1WT, hM1Dq, hM4WT, and hM4Di receptor cell lines (Table 1; n=3) but demonstrated no wild type receptor agonism in functional assays (n=3). In contrast, clozapine stimulated Thr202/Tyr204 phosphorylation at hM4Di receptors (Table 1; n=3) and IP1 accumulation in hM1Dq receptors (Table 1; n=3) more potently than CNO. C57bl/6J mice exhibited a dose-dependent increase in plasma CNO following 0.3, 1, or 1.5 mg/kg CNO injection (50.1 nM ± 0.16; 575.44 nM ± 0.03; 467.7 nM ± 0.09; n=3), yet CNO brain exposure was not detected. However, clozapine was detected in plasma and brains of these mice, indicating CNO back-metabolism.
Conclusions: Clozapine has greater affinity and potency than CNO at muscarinic DREADDs in vitro. Furthermore, CNO was back-metabolism to brain-penetrating clozapine in vivo. Collectively, this suggests clozapine may be a muscarinic DREADD agonist in vivo.
References:
1. Gomez, J.L. et al. (2017). Science, 357, 503-507.
2. Armbruster, B. N. et al. (2007). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104 (12), 5163-8. 4.
Log (M) pKi and EC50 values at hM1WT, hM1Dq, hM4WT and hM4Di receptors | ||||||
[3H]-NMS Displacement LogpKi (M) (S.E.M.) | IP1 Accumulation or Thr202/Tyr204 phosphorylation LogEC50 (M) (S.E.M.) | |||||
ACh | CNO | Clozapine | ACh | CNO | Clozapine | |
hM1WT | -5.02 (± 0.04) |
-5.09 (± 0.09) |
-7.4 (± 0.04) |
-7.85 (± 0.14) |
||
hM1Dq | -2.95 (± 0.08) |
-6.91 (± 0.06) |
-8.84 (± 0.07) |
-3.24 (± 0.13) |
-8.18 (± 0.08) |
-10.65 (+/- 0.2) |
hM4WT | -4.55 (± 0.33) |
-4.85 (± 0.05) |
-7.08 (± 0.28) |
-6.92 (± 0.13) |
||
hM4Di | -2.66 (± 0.11) |
-6.24 (± 0.03) |
-8.03 (± 0.432) |
-2.76 (± 0.09) |
-7.26 (± 0.14) |
-9.53 (+/- 0.26) |